|
|
|
REHABILITATING THE BAROQUE:
THE GENIUS
OF ROME
1592-1623
a show at
The Royal Academy of Arts,
London
20 January - 16 April 2001
|
It seems the reputation of the Baroque has,
except perhaps among contemporary classical architects, been
completely rehabilitated. The Royal Academy's show "The
Genius of Rome", had its title been the only clue and the
show hung instead early in the twentieth rather than the
twenty first century, might have suggested a theme organized
around the High Renaissance of Raphael and Michelangelo.
Instead, we are finally able to recognize the unqualified
genius of Annibale Carracci (although still not a household
name) and Michelangelo Merisi, alias Caravaggio, and those
who fell into their orbits. The show does tend to favor, in
quantity at least, Caravaggio and his Caravaggisti, a marked contrast to last
year's show held in Rome titled "L'Idea del
Bello", which depended for its theme on the
favorites of the 17th century classical theorist Pietro
Bellori; indeed, covering much of the same historical
ground, the Bellori show probably gave a more accurate
picture of the artistic climate in Rome in the early 1600's,
whereas the current London show tends to favor no doubt the
interests of the host Academicians: portraits, landscape and
genre are in great supply here, while the higherbrow history
paintings favored by Bellori seem marginalized (for these
from this epoch, take a walk over to the National Gallery,
whose principal 17th century room could almost sustain a
show of the same theme, in addition to one of Caravaggio's
finest paintings). A Humanist might have wanted more
attention paid to the thematic undercurrent of the
allegorical/mythical/religious works, but it is hard to
fault such a popular show for lack of intellectual appeal
when the sensual and emotional aspects, in works like
Caravaggio's recently discovered "The Taking of Christ" from
Dublin (via the Jesuits), are so brilliantly represented.
Indeed, a theme taken up in the catalogue, competition and
jealousy, is appropriately raised in the home of an artists'
academy; it was that vigorous, relentless competition that
spurred ever greater feats of both miraculous naturalism
(have a close look at Christ's interlocking fingers in the
above mentioned painting: the artist proving himself capable
of the most difficult aspects of the figure in a virtuosic
display of observation) and narrative drama. This is the
"full-blooded" art that Wittkower praised, and it is
inspiring to see it so widely appreciated again.
©
Poliphilo 25 February MMI
Also read: 'A
Rhetorician of the Brush' Review
Back to Reviews Index:
|